tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3953654.post3177208028590514465..comments2024-02-29T03:29:52.934-05:00Comments on A List Of Things Thrown Five Minutes Ago: Adamhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02113168955236758821noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3953654.post-1607539960295992632013-05-28T21:02:06.100-04:002013-05-28T21:02:06.100-04:00Know what would be great? A "Godfather III.&...Know what would be great? A "Godfather III." [No there wasn't.]Russnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3953654.post-17680548365018919622013-05-28T14:53:07.113-04:002013-05-28T14:53:07.113-04:00That would be an interesting post. Most desired un...That would be an interesting post. Most desired unlikely-to-happen threequels.Tosy and Coshnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3953654.post-24897620223543420942013-05-28T14:04:39.749-04:002013-05-28T14:04:39.749-04:00Definitely the best movie on that list, and one of...Definitely the best movie on that list, and one of my faves ever. But it probably benefits by stretching the definition of threequel. (Our extensive pondering about the reality/continuity of the Muppet universe notwithstanding).christy in nycnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3953654.post-84012511924267494612013-05-28T11:57:43.896-04:002013-05-28T11:57:43.896-04:00I'd argue to bump "Men in Black 3" t...I'd argue to bump "Men in Black 3" to at least meh. Far more engaging and fun than the second one, with some nice character moments.<br /><br />But yeah, sticking the landing on the 3rd part of anything is tricky.Jason Carlinnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3953654.post-89480492780436725222013-05-28T10:36:46.160-04:002013-05-28T10:36:46.160-04:00There should be a category above "sporadicall...There should be a category above "sporadically amusing" for "Muppets Take Manhattan," which is, per that list, the greatest comedy threequel ever.David Bennerhttp://www.facebook.com/dbennernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3953654.post-66861597388850551272013-05-27T23:06:32.554-04:002013-05-27T23:06:32.554-04:00I think Hangover III was actually interesting. It...I think Hangover III was actually interesting. It is (admittedly) laugh-light and spends far too much time with a terribly unlikable and not particularly interesting character (Chow), but it actually commits to doing something very different (and much darker) than the first two movies, and features a fascinating performance from Galifianakis. Actually, I'd be interested to see how critics and audiences responded if this was released as Hangover II. I think the reception would have been much warmer.Mattnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3953654.post-18677494434218400552013-05-27T22:43:32.339-04:002013-05-27T22:43:32.339-04:00As long as Dame Maggie Smith breathes air, I will ...As long as Dame Maggie Smith breathes air, I will hold out hope for a Sister Act 3.christy in nycnoreply@blogger.com