A List Of Things Thrown Five Minutes Ago

SO ONCE AGAIN, JONES, WHAT WAS BRIEFLY YOURS IS NOW MINE: I officially hate comic book writer Marv Wolfman, because he's kinda right about this interpretation of The Greatest Action Movie Ever, as translated by Popwatch:

[W]e were all wrong about Indiana Jones .. in Raiders of the Lost Ark, he's not a hero... he's a bystander....

In Raiders of the Lost Ark, the Nazis' big plan is to locate and open the Ark of the Covenant. Indiana Jones tries to stop them at every turn. He fails. Because at the end of the film, the Nazis still get the Ark and open it. Look at it this way: if you remove Indy from the film, the outcome is the same. The Nazis go to Marion Ravenwood in Tibet and get the headpiece of the staff of Ra. They already know where the Map Room is, so — possessing the actual headpiece which will give them the right height for the staff — they find the Well of Souls easy-peasy, put the Ark on a truck, and drive it to a submarine bound for the island. (Or, they could've flown it there as planned.) Then, they open the Ark and everyone dies.

While I can't lay claim to this theory, it saddens me to say that I wholeheartedly agree with it. All Indy does is slow them down and cause a little property damage. He never stops them from getting the Ark. And, I guess, he saves Marion's life. But the Nazis win. (Oh, and by the way, remember that fertility god statue Indy was after in the film's open? Belloq gets it.) Not only is Indiana Jones a completely reactive character, his actions dictated entirely by what other people do, he's a big honking loser.

And as a commenter there noted, "Actually, if Indy hadn't blown up the flying wing, the Ark would have been opened in Berlin and Hitler would have been there when it opened. So, basically, he saved Hitler."

So, gang: is Wolfman right? And if so, why is the movie nevertheless so awesome?