IT OFFENDS PEOPLE: I don't mean to step on TPE's post about Bork, but many of us who both write on and read this blog are alumni of the University of Chicago law school, and Bork was both an alumnus and a participant in some important parts of the school's history, and -- without touching on any of the stuff that would require invocation of The Rule -- I wanted to add two additional thoughts:
On Bork as a young man: Abner Mikva, who taught at the
the U of C at the same time that many of us were enrolled
there, was a law school classmate and long-time close friend of Bork despite
their divergent political views, and he told many fond stories of Bork
(including that, in preparation for Bork’s confirmation process, Mikva had advised
Bork to “Get rid of the beard – it offends people”). My favorite was from
the famed antitrust class that (future Attorney General) Edward Levi taught for
four days a week and seminal U of C economist Aaron Director untaught on the
fifth day. One day, Director made the argument that rent-control laws
were bad because they ended up pricing the people they were supposed to help
out of the market in the first place, so those laws should never be
enacted. At the end of class, Bork rushed to the lectern, and asked,
breathlessly (as Mikva tells it), “but what about the poor widows? Would
you get rid of the rent control laws and put them out on the street?”
“Young man,” Director reportedly replied, “I said you should never enact rent control
laws. I didn’t say anything about getting rid of them.” When I heard the
story, Mikva added, with a chuckle, “Bork, he was the biggest bleeding-heart
liberal of us all.”*
On Bork as a writer: In law school, one of my favorite things
about law books was their comprehensive and effusive acknowledgements
sections. The double-acknowledgements section in my version of Bork’s The
Antitrust Paradox, which reprinted the original acknowledgements and then
added a second acknowledgements section for the anniversary
edition, was, to my mind, the pinnacle of this art. It had a beginning
and an ending (if no middle) and told a tale that included friendship,
camaraderie, conflict (regarding the reaction to the original publication of
the book), triumph, and actual unexpected heartbreak (the death of Bork’s wife). It was a
short thank-you note with all the flavors of a decent novel. Whatever
else one thinks about Bork, and people have certainly thought about him a lot,
that acknowledgements section framed him for me in a light in which I think most people
(other than Mikva) usually didn’t see him.
*I cannot vouch either for the accuracy of the story as originally told to me or for the accuracy of my recollection of the story. It was a long time ago.
I had often heard - and been confused by - the fact that Bork and Mikva were law school classmates, as Mikva is '51 and Bork is '53. While researching the obit today, I discovered that they, in fact, started school together in '48, but Bork got called up by the Marines and he left for two years after their 2L year, returning to graduate in '53. Mystery solved.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the stories, Isaac. I'll have to go find those acknowledgements.
I do recall the bit in Tempting of America where Bork relayed that people would come up to him and thank him for talking more openly about using condoms confusing him, apparently, with C. Everett Koop.
ReplyDeleteHow could people confuse them? Sure, the beard, but the most distinctive thing about Koop was the fact that he started the ridiculous tradition of the Surgeon General wearing the uniform of an actual general.
ReplyDeleteSurgeon General Koop revived the tradition of wearing the ceremonial uniform on a regular (non-ceremonial) basis, which is arguably silly. But the head of the Public Health Service, along with everyone one of the Public Health Service's commissioned officers, always has and will wear dress blues for formal occasions. They also all get saluted by enlisted military personnel, have DOD-style decals on their windshield, get into O-clubs, have comparable diplomatic standing, and are treated like military officers in most contexts. Same thing with the NOAA.
ReplyDeleteIf people were confused by the beard alone I think it's plausible they wouldn't be disabused of that confusion by the lack of insignia.
ReplyDeleteAnd one could certainly argue that considering the staggering level of their responsibilities, they deserve it.
ReplyDeleteNot everybody with a lot of responsibility (even in the government) should be treated as a military officer. I don't think people who are not in the military should bear military rank or wear military uniforms. If you were at no point a lieutenant, you should not ever become a general. And I don't think the Secretary of State or the chief of the FBI or the White House Chief of Staff -- all people who have responsibilities greater than that of the Surgeon General -- should get to wear uniforms either. If you're a civilian in a civilian post, wear civvies.
ReplyDeleteVery great post. I simply stumbled upon your weblog and wanted to say that I have
ReplyDeletetruly enjoyed browsing your weblog posts. After all I will
be subscribing to your rss feed and I'm hoping you write again very soon!
Take a look at my weblog :: jocuri online bubble 3
I have read so many content on the topic of the blogger lovers but this article is in fact a nice paragraph, keep it up.
ReplyDeleteHave a look at my blog jocuri online masini