Tuesday, July 10, 2007
KANSAS CITY SHUFFLE: Honestly, the legal holdings in Central Mfg. Corp. v. Brett Bros. are completely bland, wholly expected, and well-deserved (plaintiff is a well-known vexatious litigant), but the opening few pages, which include a summary of George Brett's career, the "pine tar" incident, and a contrast between metal and wooden bats, is reminiscent of Flood v. Kuhn and worth a few moments of your time.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment