Friday, January 15, 2010

A REVIEW OF A MOVIE I BARELY REMEMBER*: With Parenthood, a TV show, debuting some time this fall on the Haiti of TV networks, I thought it would be worth a quick, research-free examination of the show's source material, 1989's Parenthood, a movie.

When Parenthood (pronounced, according to my friends' unfunny joke, "Paren Thood") came out in 1989, the world was a different place. Everybody in America lived in large colonial revival houses in leafy suburbs. You may not remember this, but back then, before European explorers discovered gay urban gentrification and the entertainment value of gunplay, it was quite common to make a movie like Parenthood. So common that Steve Martin managed to make two, simultaneously, on the same set, with the same director and many of the same actors -- in fact, both Parenthood and Father of the Bride even use common footage spliced into both reels. This doesn't quite explain why, at 19 years old, I saw the movie, and frankly, I cannot remember or imagine the circumstances that led me to the theater, although I'm sure it happened. In that respect, this movie is like sleep-eating or an alien abduction.

The central struggle in Parenthood is that Steve Martin is extremely successful but feels like maybe he should be only very successful, because his father is a dick. Essentially, he wants to be exactly successful enough to assume the role of patriarch of his extended family without worrying about the mortgage on his large colonial revival house in a leafy suburb, and any of his success beyond that is just wasted success. He has one son who he believes is a psychotic murderer in training, but who actually is only a chronic masturbator who sexualizes a brown paper bag and is exactly as weird as the actor playing him will grow up to be. His other son wears a garbage can on his head and runs into walls.

Nobody in the entire extended family looks the least bit alike. If you were to do a statistical study of caucasian DNA and identify the ten or so samples least like each other, you would have identified the cast of Parenthood.

A lot of the middle parts of this are hazy, but I'm pretty sure three things happen: (1) somebody walks in on Martha Plimpton having sex; (2) somebody accidentally activates Dianne Wiest's vibrator in the middle of a family gathering; and (3) Steve Martin's brother, Tom Hulce, shows up, unannounced, with a biracial son named Cool in tow. You could think a long time about what it's supposed to signify that Hulce's son is a ridiculously named biracial kid and that the family is scandalized, either by the race or the profession (Las Vegas showgirl, anachronistic even in 1989) of the mother, but don't get too worked up. Nothing in this movie means anything -- it is a grab-bag of prefabricated folly slapped together without concern for cogency, so if you try to dig into subtext you'll hurt only yourself. Anyway, Hulce is the black sheep of the family, the anti-Steve Martin, because his self-loathing has its roots in failure (rather than excessive success) and his response to it is to fail more (rather than succeeding).

As an aside, it is difficult to decide which was worse: Hulce's performance or his being cast in the first place. He is supposed to be a chronic fuckup and self-styled rebel with fraying ties to his middle-class past, but Hulce makes no effort to suppress his college-theater diction and demeanor, relying instead on a bad MTV Veejay Mark Goodman Halloween costume to create the character for him. Hulce as a dead-end drifter must rank up there with Denise Richards as a nuclear physicist and Tara Reid as a southern trophy wife in the annals of credulity-straining performances.

I'm quite sure some other things happen, including Hulce's inevitable and welcome disappearance, but I can't remember exactly what. What I do recall is that the movie ends with everybody suddenly and simultaneously giving birth.

You can see why this needed to be made into a television series.

*Due to fading memory, some facts in this review may be inaccurate.

20 comments:

  1. Marsha4:49 PM

    The masturbating son belongs to Diane Wiest. He's got "issues' because his parents are divorced and daddy only wants to spend time with his new family. He turns out fine bcause he fixes his mom up with his science teacher. 

    Martin's son is the one with the anxiety issues who can't catch a fly ball.

    I enjoy this movie, although i freely admit it isn't a GOOD movie. Rick Moranis singing the Carpenters to Harley Jane Kozak gets me every damn time, even though I know it's stupid and manipulative. But I completely agree with you that Hulce is horrible and horribly miscast.

    ReplyDelete
  2. "*Due to fading memory, some facts in this review may be inaccurate."

    Facts? Facts! Who needs facts? Your review is full of truthiness, that beats facts, every time.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The Other Kate7:03 PM

    <p><span style=" font-family: Calibri;">An impressive encapsulation, Isaac. Parenthood IS pretty terrible but it’s terrible in a cozy, insidiously watchable way. It's become surprisingly quotable within my own family. </span>
    <p><span style=" font-family: Calibri;">Tom Hulce: Grandma! You got shorter.</span>
    <p><span style=" font-family: Calibri;">Grandma: I’m shrinking.</span>
    <p><span style=" font-family: Calibri;">Tom Hulce: Bummer!</span>
    <p><span style=" font-family: Calibri;">What a laugh riot, amiright? But Tom says “Bummer!” in this ridiculously blithe, italicized way we've found very useful when someone shares a particularly dull or petty gripe. </span><span style=" font-family: Calibri;">"Hiiii, [insert name]," in the saccharine, smiley/creepy manner of Dianne Weist (“Hiiii, Gaaaary!”), attempting to be positive around her sullen, masturbating son--played by Joaquin Phoenix back when he was “Leaf"--has gotten mileage too, as has Dianne’s hysterical, “Look! You’ve UPSET YOUR BROTHER!”</span>
    <p><span style=" font-family: Calibri;">And "Close to You" gets to me every time too, dammit. </span>

    ReplyDelete
  4. And Keanu Reeves has the best performance in the movie.

    ReplyDelete
  5. <span style="">Everybody in America lived in large colonial revival houses in leafy suburbs.</span>

    This made me laugh because that's how it felt in the 1980s (in large part because of John Hughes).  Growing up in the southwest I didn't see a house with columns on leafy street until my 20s, but nevertheless the suburbs I grew up in didn't seem as much like "real America."  

    ReplyDelete
  6. Maret8:29 PM

    Keanu Reeves gives his best film performance, period, in Parenthood. Though I freely admit I hate Keanu and only tink he's ok when he plays idiots.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Alex Gordon8:30 PM

    No, the best performance is by Martin's youngest son who spends most of the film with a bucket on his head. Also Clint Howard puts in a superb turn as an angry Little League father.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Linda8:51 PM

    Agree with Alex about the youngest son.   Love him. 

    I completely tear up and smile at this movie.  While recognizing that it is well....bad...I guess.   :) 

    ReplyDelete
  9. Adam C.9:04 PM

    NO BUSINESS!!!

    ReplyDelete
  10. J. Bowman9:26 PM

    Not to mention he has the best line in the whole movie:
    "<span style="">You know, Mrs. Buckman, you need a license to buy a dog, to drive a car - hell, you even need a license to catch a fish. But they'll let any butt-reaming asshole be a father."</span>

    ReplyDelete
  11. Leslie9:34 PM

    Maybe I'm in the minority, but I LOVE this movie. I guess because its so quotable. I don't know.  But Adam C. said my favorite quote, one that my husband and I say to each other all the time.  The other is when grumpy patriarch Jason Robards is having some quality time with his son Tom Hulce, his wife comes out to say Cool has finished lunch, and Jason Robards says with snarky tone, "I'll call the papers." That's a classic.  

    ReplyDelete
  12. kd bart9:54 PM

    Better version of The Carpenter's "Close To You":

    Rick Moranis in Parenthood or Kurt Russell in The Best of Times?

    ReplyDelete
  13. lislisased12:05 AM

    And then he shrugs off this brilliant thought and goes back to being the slacker he is. I loved that.

    ReplyDelete
  14. bill.5:41 AM

    Kurt Russell. Better actor, better singer, better movie.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Adam C.3:22 PM

    Clint Howard's reading of that "NO BUSINESS!!" line is everything -- he just kills it.  And yeah, my friends and I spent a fair amount of our college years trotting that line out at opportune moments.

    ReplyDelete
  16. kd bart6:25 PM

    It must be written into every one of Ron Howard's directing contracts that there must be a 3-5 line role for Clint.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Mr. Cosmo9:47 PM

    This movie taught me never to ask my children if they felt like they had to throw up . . . "OK".

    ReplyDelete
  18. Sum1ROther12:14 PM

    "With Parenthood, a TV show, debuting some time this fall on the Haiti of TV networks..." What a brilliantly clever and classy remark. And so perfectly timed as well! Asshole.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Stacie from St. Louis11:50 PM

    I loved this movie, too!!  I teach child development course as well as other psych courses and often use this movie to depict the different layers of family relationships, and the different ways parents handle issues (a child with severe anxiety (Steve Martin's kid), parents with unrealistic expectations (Rick Moranis), divorce (Dianne Weist), teenage pregnancy, and unresolved issues with aging parents.  (Sorry if I sound too therapist-y). 

    ReplyDelete
  20. spacewoman12:32 AM

    I love this movie and I don't care who knows it.  If you don't tear up when anxious kid Kevin finally catches that fly ball, then you, sir, have no heart. 

    ReplyDelete